Of course reading this article, you may think it, we recommend to study the language, some one very important method, which we now have three articles in a row as advertised. We think that all of you know that in our paper we is not about any particular method with a set of techniques, but the overall essence of the right, human approach, taking into account the mentality of trainees. In any case, we would talk about whether or not the "correct" approach, the semantic method, but anyway, the lives of many of us "complete their education" on the principle of conversational language, the semantic method, when we were lucky and happened in my life, meet a native speaker, which turned out to fill "gaps". Or, turned out to find teacher holding a spoken, semantic methods. The second important piece of advice for those who want to learn the language of quality – choosing a teacher, give preference to professionals with a view of the above recommendations. Today, "found" unprofessional teacher much easier, and wherever he worked, if instead of giving you a conversational situation, he starts chasing you by the book, forcing to perform tasks and hack words, run from him as soon as possible.

Such teachers are easily distinguishable because, as he likes, instead of rewards for your efforts to communicate, constantly make comments, and rejoicing, your every mistake, behaves according to the principle: "I – Chief, you – fool. At Sela Ward you will find additional information. " Agree, it's silly to put estimates for what we do not teach a language, and how to get used to it. It's like a doctor, would put the assessment of the patient, to the extent that his body would adapt to the new state. Before you as a layman, if he agrees to lead a group of more than 10 people, because with so many people to arrange a live conversation is very difficult if to say – it is not possible. If classes are held only on the basis of teaching aids, without the involvement of periodicals and other sources of the target language (newspapers, radio, movies, magazines, books). If he transfers his emotions and personal problems in the learning process, if the lesson from it all sit for a strictly party if all of his techniques and methods can be reduced to that language, or rather his study – not a means, purpose, and the teacher does not understand this, he does not know the basics of their profession. You can safely leave such a teacher. You have it learned nothing, apart from a jagged good hundred words. After all, knowledge of the language – it is not a profession to know the language can be any, but qualitatively teach others to speak freely to him – it is an art.