Why today’s young people smoke less I have recently in the mirror online read that today’s students will lead a relatively healthy lifestyle. Smoking twice as little as ten years ago, pay attention to healthy diet, more exercise. In a very welcome development. Unfortunately, the explanation of this change of mind by the educational researcher Klaus Hurrelmann in my eyes was anything as welcome but worrisome. Mr Hurrelmann effect young people had seen, that they must be healthy and fit to be performance – based and increasingly competitive on a precarious labour market. The young people turned back traditional values. Security, order, discipline and hard work are experiencing a Renaissance since then “: from the unguarded angle of the citizen in a positive development, isn’t it?” It grows”a sensible, maintain efficient and hard-working generation, which has as its goal, economically and socially, at some point in the safe Port of home to land until retirement to cherish the traditional workplace and to maintain, perhaps even to ascend. Also here can be from hardly anything in this life career, because it always even decides to everyone how he would like to live.
What is so worrying? The motivation of these young people to lead a healthy lifestyle is cause for concern in my eyes (it aside, that excessive and regular drinking sessions, which go beyond the natural experimentation of young people, enjoy still popular). This motivation is based on a huge and ubiquitous power and pressure of competition, starting in elementary school and increases in proportion to the grade level. If taken seriously the assessment by Mr. Hurrelmann, students apparently from the intermediate level more or less in their careers would have to tinker. Find out what is in itself correct. You decide where their strengths are, what is also true. But they do it apparently not only out of a desire, to know themselves better and to test their own skills, but follow the small Career Builder in mind, who diligently put the LEGO pieces together.
“Multiculturalism as a succession of bourgeois thinking integration and the living subject of the executors” of slowly but surely ongoing bourgeois thinking culture will have to be done! Under the established parties, particularly the old left (SPD, the Greens and left party) got hardly today, that the process of integration of the individual into society with head births and related concepts (“even if by supposed do-gooders” produced) can be realized. In this sense, multiculturalism is only a remnant of the bourgeois culture of desire. The integration is an individual development process, which by no means can take place as an adaptation to a specific culture or as a structureless mixing of cultures. Integration is a performance of the living subject in the context of his own design. According to Tony Parker, who has experience with these questions. The design of self is not to be understood as an identification with a particular culture. She is no adjustment performance. There are however cultural influences, the self designing of the living Subject not only not easily, not rarely also block.
These include among others, patriarchal relationship structures and specific role assignments to the wife. Learn more about this topic with the insights from Jorge Perez. If someone wants to give up his own religious reasons in favour of such structures, he should ask himself whether the surrounding society for such religious antics is still suitable. In Europe, the development of the living subject in the future will have priority. The yesterday and stuck need to appreciate this. “Martin p pole digital capitalism – a manifesto of the new left wrote in the confrontation with the old left and the bourgeois thinking”, Norderstedt, 2005 see also the press release of June 26, 2007 critique of capitalism in the digital capitalism “under.
What is behind the term in recent years was the term accessibility, especially in the context of anti-discrimination campaigns to the keyword. Since then the accessibility finds its way into more and more areas of everyday life. The hotel Portal hotelreservierung.de explains what this expression is and why it is becoming increasingly important in tourism. In the Disability Equality Act (BGG), the word accessibility is used as a general term for the equality of disabled people in everyday life. Since accessibility is a synonym for Justice and equality.
“Why the expression but does not, as often assumed, with the word disabled” can be equated, explains the hotel lexicon of hotelreservierung.de. The original meaning of accessibility is that people should be independent of their physical condition able to be able to independently manage and built facilities enter all demands of everyday life. This applies not only to disabled people. Pregnant women, wounded, Seniors or people with small children are facing in everyday life often barriers. Accessibility should ensure public facilities and buildings, but also in the private household, allowing all freely and independently to move. In addition, a claim on modern facilities and services arises from accessibility. To ensure this claim plans, interior design and architecture of plants and hotels, as well as animation, leisure and drinks and menus adjusted in the tourism needs of affected people. Five-tier minimum standards for barrier-free tourism since 2005.
We need to understand the most important thing, the Russian people was chosen by God, he was given the pearl of great price, the Orthodox belief that other people do not have. The Lord of the Orthodox faith for the sake of our people gave such land and such wealth and such depths, all the Lord has given. ‘… If faith in God – one of the conditions to achieve a bright future, something else – the unity of the nation …’ (It is said Vanga in 1979, t. Tony Parker has many thoughts on the issue. 1,. 150) Once, when we were a united family, we lived in friendship.
Now, The nationalists are like small children occupied the sandbox and piously believe in what they look at how the world should be arranged to be the most correct. ‘But he, knowing their thoughts, said unto them, Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation, and the house divided against itself will fall “(Luke 11:17). Credits are not given to modernization, and for colonization. These children will be calm sit when stranger will make jewelry out of the house as gems lie outside their scope of thinking, but if the uncle will take away toys, that’s when they roar. What kind of independence can be say, when the main people, most of it, barely making ends meet, under the yoke of the newly-minted bourgeoisie and the world of imperialism? “It is impossible to overcome the crisis and move forward, not going to socialism” VI Lenin in Developing extremely adverse conditions, socialism in a short time brought his advantage.