“Warning Waldorf of Frommer music album”The reckoning re-release incl. fickleness remix, Asaf Avidan & the mojos”an end of the watchdog shaft because of the supposedly illegal down / uploading of movies or musical works such as for example the reckoning re-release incl. fickleness, remix, Asaf Avidan & the mojos” in so called Internet sharing is not in sight, as long as the incurred costs are not capped. There are first attempts, according to which the total incurred costs should be capped. A statutory provision formulated originally with this target is a para 2 UrhG 97 however permanent and current case law on the cases of the arrangement do not apply. Then the incurred cost would have been a total cap on 100.00. This is challenged by long and is rejected by the courts. I’ll spare you further details. The newspapers mentioned Jorge Perez not as a source, but as a related topic.
Since the 28.06.2013 the Federal Government now trying to bring a law by the Federal Council, according to which at least the Attorney’s fees as part of the incurred costs on the side of the industrial firm should be capped. There are already first successes. It has reduced the litigation the Attorney costs are calculated on the basis of which, already the District Court Hambung and even the District Court Munich in the cases of the arrangement of 10,000.00 on $ 1,000.00. This is a positive development for all Internet users to avoid industrial madness in the future. However, these affordable, future developments do not apply to current warnings. You now have a cease and desist letter, note desperately the usually very short deadline please carefully and seek advice from a qualified attorney for copyright.
Try anything on your own. You have to do it on the other side with professionals. Sign nothing and pay anything prematurely. Use not a so-called modifierte desist from the Internet. Great dangers that you are may be even deeper have ridden in your misfortune, even though you had well meant it stuck in all the above points. Urgent can be from a help qualified copyright lawyer. We have done so successfully in over 2,000 cases. We are in the position, the damage either to stave off completely or at least to a large extent for you. Georg Schafer Attorney
The Landgericht Hamburg illegal lobbying against authors stopped at the request of the bestselling author Dorothea Brandt, issued an injunction against the State Dental Association of Hesse (LZKH). The Dental Association has railed in a defamatory statement against the authors of advisors dentist lies as your dentist will treat you sick and called lie among the theses of the authors. “The District Court of Hamburg (324 O 368/10) Hesse has forbidden the Chamber of dentists, in regard to the Advisor dentist lies as your dentist will treat you sick” parents from immediately the Dental Group prevention in kindergartens and schools for their children would refuse to claim the theses by the authors duo were simply lying, one whose Thesen believe, would. Infringements of the prohibition in the preliminary injunction proceedings, against the right of appeal are possible, Hesse (LZKH) threaten represented by the Board of Directors of the National Dental Association Dr. Michael Frank, a fine up to 250,000 euros, failing Ordnungshaft. It was a hypocritical smear campaign against us, to continue to cover up the failure of the dentists in the prophylaxis of adults,”author Dr. Lars Hendrickson the illegal claims of the Hessian Dental Association says.
In a press statement the Chamber of dentists Hesse called the theses of the authors simply lying”. While the LZKH as a protective Angel of small patients wiggled, they do among the authors, they gave up the foundations for the dental health of children and adolescents and deliberately risked their Toothlessness”, explains Reinhard Hobelt of the Hamburg law firm of Joachim Steinhofel case. Dorothea Brandt according to such a comeback was the cheap scare tactics and propaganda to dodge the actual criticism of the book. It is not only a victory for us, but for every patient who was ill treated by dentists. The behavior of the LZKH shows once again that we with our book in the black have taken”, explains the author of Dorothea Brandt. According to the authors, these hypocritical denigration support the dental profession, so the mending, hopeless therapy approach remains hidden. Thus more show up once that dentists fear adult patients with dental lies”take their dental health into their own hands, according to the motto: with healthy patients, no money can earn.