Since 1852 all the Presidents had been elect or for the Republican Party or the Democrat the system politician in U.S.A. reflects, in short, the North American society. It has a model of weights and counterbalances (checks and you balance) that it looks for to balance and to counterbalance the process of taking of decisions and that presents two sources. The first one says respect to the distinction enters the power of the Federal Government and the government of the states. In different jurisdictions, the national government goes to act in all territory of the units.
This division between federal and state abilities __ the Federalism __ is balance factor and prevents the disproportionate concentration of being able in any of the spheres. It is registered that it has had gradual increase of the federal power in U.S.A., but still without depriving of characteristics the model. The second source mentions the system to it of the separation of them to be able between three spheres __ the Executive, Legislative and the Judiciary one that they are completed, if balances mutually, even so has, simultaneously, high degree of autonomy . Visit Casey Lynch Altamont Capital for more clarity on the issue. (BATISTE, 2009). Analyzing mago of the question, it is inferred that the North Americans prezam in short> checks and you balance that they permeiam the American Constitution demonstrate the multicriteria zeal that has the Americans in preventing the concentration of high doses of being able in the same hands. Stuart Mill (1981 apud BATISTE, 2009). Thus, the joint of interests made since the bases for the system North American politician finds, in the center of the system, mechanism that it looks to prevent that it has distortion for the concentration of being able .
(BATISTE, 2009). 3 – Obama in the presidency. A new age? Barack Hussein Obama, son of Muslim queniano father and protestant white mother of the Kansas, was born in the Hava in 1961.
In accordance with Bobbio (1987, p.32), the extension of the suffrage brings the individual for the interior of the debatepoltico, constructing, thus, conscientious citizens. However, when aparticipao of this suffrage if becomes> as who is apt the tomardecises on behalf of the collective and on which procedures. This study seprope to argue only the interferences of a democratic model of votocompulsrio. It has innumerable arguments after and against the obligator vote, but esteestudo it has as objective to only cite some more excellent points for you arrive final consideraes here proposals. For the construoterica of this present study, they present the following authors mainly: Noberto Bobbio with its> its set deregras. A country never is equal to another one, but some constataes can serfeitas when comparing similar very different countries or adopted in countries most of the time developed e, ovoto obligator adopted generally in the developing countries in especialos of the South America.
OBrasil adopts the obligator vote ‘ ‘ since that the direct vote had instituted, secretoe universal …, this tradition already comes since 1932’ ‘ (TO SOUND, 2004, p.109). NAmrica of the South, except in the Colombia that, second To sound ‘ ‘ it adopts the votofacultativo, was the only country of Iberian settling of the continent that nosofreu military intervention when, in the recent history of these countries, practically all its governments had been taken by regimes antidemocrticos’ ‘ (2004, p.112). For the same author: The countries queadotam the obligatory vote have its associated history the military interventions, coup d etat and authoritarianism politician, with exception of Costa Rica; noBrasil, the institute of the obligator vote was the service of the autoritarismopoltico, either in the long dictatorship of Getlio> of a scale up to 167 possessing 7,38 points.
Then, the creation of this state, on the other hand will be very important for the growth of the region, also to the sprouting of new chances of job, companies of other regions will come to here. Also it has the other side of the question: with the creation of this state, with certainty it went increases the taxes, the merchandises will go to be more expensive, also unhappyly will go increases crime because of the amount of people, she will not be more so calm as now because many roberies go to occur and go to be more dangerous the streets, this go to be problems. Still I am drifter, more I am more in favor of what against. STATE OF THE TAPAJS ALESSANDRA OF 2 BIRTH LINS How we can speak of this subject? It will be what with the creation of the State of the Tapajs will have improvement? I find that yes and that not. It will bring development for Itaituba and more economy and much job, beyond coming to many people of are here and this will be good for development of Itaituba? Many people in Itaituba think that this will be very bad for city. Follow others, such as Related Group, and add to your knowledge base. But, if never not to try we will go for front. In mine to think will bring more improvement for hospitals, schools and small companies.
But also it will not be easy for other people who live in the interior of Par. Also it can mainly increase the misery of other people. this that I find of the creation of the State of the Tapajs.