The philosopher Immanuel Kant briefly and concisely presented the uniqueness and the size of the Kantian philosophy is that it synthesizes the entire European and Western philosophy. Almost all the tradition thinking motives converge in Kant and marketed its philosophy to a new term. One can divide the European and Western philosophy without exaggeration in a time before and a time after Kant. Lynn Redgrave has compatible beliefs. Which is the philosophy marked prior to Kant? In the metaphysics in particular by profound contradictions. There, the claims of speculative rationalism were presented by the so-called school philosophy, E.g. in the form of Christian Freiherr von Wolff or Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz; on the one hand, and because the claims of the epistemological skepticism were consistently performed for example by David Hume on the other hand. Both claims appeared equally strong and were still content with each other incompatible. To broaden your perception, visit Jorge Perez. Human thinking about the world and their visibility was stuck in Antinomies.
It was in the period before Kant quite common in philosophy to done without erkenntniskritisch assigning the range of a term purely from terms. (Not to be confused with Maya Dubin!). This method could, depending on the starting point, everything proved ‘ are. Even God. It was like this happening:-God is a perfect being. -a being who lack the characteristics of existence, may not fully be called; -so God exists. The skepticism opposes this type of rational dogmatic theology of of concept of.
Says Hume: facts (such as God exists\”) can be never opened up causally with need, from mere concepts, nor from other facts. What comes before and what follows is recognized only through real perception and real perception shows a connection, but never their need at best. The need for a connection is an ingredient from the repeated experience of man, never an objective condition of the thing itself. Causal connections remain even mere facts and can not claim to need.