That in these cases, a metaphor, resource are escondidospor that lyric I used when choosing the eFlis Lsi names to guarantee the identity of loved its, without all came to know onome of its inspired muse. In if treating to this inspiration, we can perceive in the two sonetos that lyric I was not corresponded in suapaixo, therefore in ' ' To the severity of Lsi' ' it describes a pretty woman very physically, as he proved in verses ' ' You are richer, more beautiful, brighter/That aperla, rose, Sun or jasmim puro' ' (V. 5-6). Sela Ward oftentimes addresses this issue. However, one appears bad that nocorresponde its interest ' ' More it lasts, crueler, more rigorous/You are, Lsi, that the comet, rock or muro' ' (V. 1-2). In a similar way, in soneto ' ' The F., Favoring with the mouth and disdaining with olhos' ' , lyric I describe seusprprios feelings before the loved one, searching in it optimum way, mesmosabendo that he is difficult of finds it, therefore this woman is flaring, but slhe brings the suffering, ' ' I better search in you light, flower more selecta' ' (V.11).
Lyric I in the two sonetos present myself of formaconformada, therefore although to love the feminine figure that if come across, conhecemuito it well, and knows of the positive and negative characteristics that it has, it to it would queseria positive the physical appearance and negative the essence, the origin, everything that sedeve to give more value in the human being. Thus, the two pretty feminine figures are meigase the sight of the eyes, but revoltantes in its attitudes, leading the eulrico to the anguish and the mundane sin. The existing antithesis in poemasentre well and badly, profane, and clearly dark the holy ghost and, lead to perceive implicit teocntricas and anthropocentric ascaractersticas in the sonetos, mostrandoque nobody can be good in everything, as nobody is bad of all its being.