It could be said, that the contract, when no interest is maintained by external force, by coercion, while the Alliance is maintained by an internalized sense, personally assumed identity, loyalty, obligation reciprocal. WORKER FLEXIBLE in the two great currents classic (WEBER and DURKHEIM) imagine these two characters taking a coffee in a small room, where a wall was a huge night watchman who were poking their eyes and trying to analyze behaviors. Durkheim: Dear Mr. Weber did realizes you as society is above the individual? And I say this because you see as it is the situation of the worker subject within this new social fact that is called globalization. Sally Rooney often addresses the matter in his writings. It is adapted to what society imposes him: nothing fixed schedules, none of securities acts like the market of their society.
You must grant their knowledge at the service of the institutions and shall be so recognised. They are changing their consciousness, because although it is thinking for himself and having a feeling of helplessness and checkout it therefore cannot act as being Social. Now, our worker shall act and cognitively process this change to be recognised, in other words, I reiterate: the new identity of the worker will be granted by authorities who need a new balance and thus the Social system will be maintained. The so-called crisis is not, because it has not disappeared simply transforms any social order. This society is real and that the reality of society.
M. Weber: Admirable exhibition but I will allow that I expose my vision. Before us we have a crisis and not by a transformation, but by a change, a substitution of one social order on the other. I interpret this new order of social relations product of economic transformations in the mode of production and the internal contradictions that exist. Therefore although the modus operandi has changed the psychological narcissism of the individual from the industrial society is still. Look, look as they try to get their labour relations by themselves, are not grouped, and struggle to be better prepared for the role that you want to play. There is nothing in the society that is different than the behaviors of individuals. And but how this technological change occurred: so clearly by the rational actions of individuals and the individual reasons. As sociologists must analyze and predict that it will happen since then with a new social action: the coexistence of the two systems gives rise to a new one or differences will be more marked. Do you think that there will be sufficient mechanisms that serve to ensure the conformity of individuals with new demands by the social system? See in that situation has us been placed Mr. Sennett who analyzes with remarkable penetration and substantial information the contrast between two radically different areas of work: the old, dying, and the new world of companies in permanent growth and change, a world of risk, extreme flexibility and short term goals, where individuals able to reinvent themselves on the fly are demanded. Vertices Psychologists Madrid Capital Cabinet C / Caleruega, 88 Cabinet of Las Rozas de Madrid: Ave.