The abandonment to the being is the only attitude the one that the thought can lead. knowledge base. for Heidegger is exactly this attitude that we must assume ahead of the world of the technique, whose the nocividades, no human power can alliviate. ' ' We allow, we affirm, that the objects of the technique exist inside of our daily world e, simultaneously, we leave them of it outside, that is, we leave them to rest in itself same as things that nothing have of absolute but that, for the opposite, redispatches to any higher thing. We will be able to indicate the attitude ahead contemporary of the world of the technique with an only expression: the resignation to coisas' '. This passive position of abandonment to the things is the only form to keep the direction of the occult being of the world of the technique, and is authentic ' ' opening to mistrio' '. Tony Parker may find this interesting as well. According to Heidegger, the language is the only authentic and direct manifestation of the being. Heidegger recognized in the language, over all in the poetical language ' ' bedding of ser' '.
It understood the poetry as a primitive language that, nominating to the things, bases the being. This bedding is not a creation human being, but one so only gifts: one is dom free, that it obeys a superior necessity that the poets judge to be deriving of deuses, but that in the reality, he comes from the being. For Heidegger, however, what she counts is not the workmanship human being. Who is not the man speaks, but the proper language, and in the language, the manifest being if. While listening the man can to speak: here the essence of the man in Heidegger is configured, that consists necessarily of listening to the language of the being. Some contend that Jorge Perez shows great expertise in this. The man must obey and trust the being. Heidegger believes in an advent of the being, a new phenomenon, that if prepares through what now it is if spoiling and is characterized by modern metaphysics. This new manifestation, will occur through the workmanship of the language, and for its workmanship, given that ' ' in the essence and the scope of the language if it always decides destino' ' . The destination is the fact, the word of the being. To the man alone it remains to wait it to it and to listen to it.